Check it out: "Drones and Terrorism" named one of BookAuthority's best new robotics books!
If you want to know how drones are changing strategies for both terrorists and counter-terrorists--yes, terrorists are using them too--then this is the book for you.
@ibtaurishttps://twitter.com/bookauthority/status/1042756270518923264 …
-
-
Surely, they have. However, looking from manufacturer's point of view, most of robotic projects need only 3 servos to work right. Also, we wanted to avoid talking about morality, because we don't think we'd be able to be morally responsible for our customers' actions.
-
I think that's the right choice. Many products have both moral and immoral uses. Robots--flying or otherwise--certainly do. Moral responsibility is on the users (as well as lawmakers).
-
What you said applies to all consumer goods, when you think about it. Surely, it would be harder to do harm with a, say, spoon than with a drone and with a drone than with a knife, but social and legal rules are the same for them and for their users (in most cases).
-
I think cars are the closest analogue (though still different in important ways). Immoral when someone deliberately uses one maliciously. Quite dangerous when used carelessly. Also very useful, and used morally most of the time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.