1) Susan Collins is right. Threatening to fund her opponent if she doesn't vote a certain way is arguably a kind of bribery. 2) Is her objection that this money comes from many people, rather than one rich person, corporation, or PAC? Because that's the only difference I can seehttps://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1039633354268835840 …
-
-
but we mostly donate to incumbents exactly _because_ of how they voted. The withholding of donations for 'bad' votes is implicit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can the same be said for the votes themselves? "vote for the bill, or we'll vote you out, ya bum!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.