In hindsight, a Presidential Slush Fund to Compensate Victims of the President’s Economically Illiterate Abuses of Power wasn’t the best idea.
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
Congress has one of these slush funds to compensate victims, too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gunntwitt
Congress has Constitutional authority over spending, and no individual member can do it by fiat. That’s not a slush fund. It’s the legislative branch’s power of the purse.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NGrossman81 @Gunntwitt
I think
@Gunntwitt was referring to the harassment slush fund.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Akh96Wangler @NGrossman81
Indeed I was… taxpayer dollars, for when the members of Congress become rapey
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gunntwitt @Akh96Wangler
That’s really bad. But it’s a lot less money and not the result of deliberate policy choices. Regardless, nothing about one of these bad things negates the badness of the other.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81 @Akh96Wangler
I didn't intend it as such. It was just an observation, given the similarities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don’t see much similarity besides money being involved, but ok.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.