Congress has one of these slush funds to compensate victims, too.
-
-
-
Congress has Constitutional authority over spending, and no individual member can do it by fiat. That’s not a slush fund. It’s the legislative branch’s power of the purse.
-
I think
@Gunntwitt was referring to the harassment slush fund. -
Indeed I was… taxpayer dollars, for when the members of Congress become rapey
-
That’s really bad. But it’s a lot less money and not the result of deliberate policy choices. Regardless, nothing about one of these bad things negates the badness of the other.
-
I didn't intend it as such. It was just an observation, given the similarities.
-
I don’t see much similarity besides money being involved, but ok.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He’s new at this.

-
Is there an eye-roll emoji?
-
Awesome.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
