Telling people to shrug at threats against Iran because threats against North Korea didn't lead to war isn't a great take. But if you buy this, I argued Trump was bluffing during "fire and fury," and I'm telling you all to worry about him threatening Iran. https://arcdigital.media/dont-worry-too-much-about-the-trump-kim-war-of-words-d8a77c0ced63 …https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1021382583114797057 …
-
-
Trump's threat against Iran isn't just words. It fits a long pattern of actions and personnel decisions (especially Bolton) that point towards the possibility he'll order an attack. Take it seriously. (END)
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And on the first point, he was spot on correct.
-
No, that’s factually inaccurate. Iran sponsors some terrorism. But a lot of terrorism is unrelated to Iran. In particular, Shia Iran isn’t responsible for Sunni jihadists (al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.) 15 of the 19 Sept 11th hijackers were Saudi. None were Iranian.
-
Iran sponsors a broad range of Shia and Sunni terrorists, and were indeed found to be aiding the 9/11 terrorists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who would get the greatest advantage if we go to war with Iran?I think Russia by way of Syria. He can't get peace in Syria ,with Assad in power ,because of Iran. So he gets USA out and then Iran out then Assad and Putin are in. With Iran weakened and Iraq at stalemate, who wins?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.