It isn't a legitimate question to me.
-
-
-
You have a strong opinion on it, and that's fine. But my point is when there are clear economic trade-offs, it's reasonable to prefer one side or the other. When there aren't--when it's all downside except the "upside" of hurting some people--then trade-off logic doesn't apply.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This sort of thing is fascinating. It doesn't change the way I'd vote, but before I'd have voted against work requirements because I think they're discriminatory & cruel - EVEN though I would've assumed there would have been a cost savings - at the expense of people's health.
-
So now, I'd still vote against them, but with the certain knowledge that those voting for them were pursuing a false economy. It does push me to re-evaluate the later-order effects of other policies I've been "voting my conscience" on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
People need to recognize that cruelty is not an unfortunate by-product of some of Trump's policies, but a major purpose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have always thought that the administrative mess & waste was the best argument against work reqs. Alas, I suspect the small gov conservs will see this as money well spent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.