“Unverified” is intelligence-speak for “need to investigate further.” The info hasn’t been confirmed but can’t be dismissed. Applying for a FISA warrant is asking a judge for permission to investigate further. Saying “unverified” over and over isn’t making the point you think.https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1021092413626961920 …
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
Ah. So if the Trump 2020 campaign produces a document saying his opponent trafficked kids in the basement of a pizza restaurant, and it can't be categorically dismissed, it should be investigated further via FISA wiretap?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @craigsuperstar
Depends. Is the FBI getting it from someone they’ve successfully worked with before? Do they have other, unrelated sources of info to support it? Does open source info point in the same direction? Then yes. I doubt your hypothetical meets all three of those. But if yes, then yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Oh, if the open source info includes leaks of the same info to friendly media, I'm sure it could be obliged.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Open source info like Page describing himself as an adviser to the Russian government in 2013. I have no idea why you think that (and a lot more) should be ignored because one Yahoo article in 2016 had questionable origins.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.