Amazing how completely the released FISA application disproves the Nunes memo's lies. When politicians lie, there's usually some ambiguity. But Nunes claimed the app hid things it actually states openly. No honest person could defend Nunes now. But I'm sure some people will try.
-
-
As
@tgriffinnc points out, here's the best possible Nunes defense: He didn't deliberately lie about what's in the FISA app. Just lied that he read it. But lobbed accusations and tried to undermine the investigation anyway. That's the defense.https://twitter.com/tgriffinnc/status/1020882729536315392 …Show this thread -
First it was FBI violated procedure by hiding that some info came from political oppo. Now, with that disproven, it's the FBI followed procedure and didn't ID by name? Really? Unmasking was something you were pretending to be upset about just last year. https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1020891960196968448 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This a straw man argument. The issue is NOT whether FBI disclosed that STEELE was the source (they did). The issue is that they didn't disclose Hillary Clinton PAID for that source. Please explain why a FISA judge shouldn't be privy to that information.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is not my field of expertise. From what I have gathered from somewhat credible sources the FISA system does not seem to be 1 guy lying & the judge out having a drink signs off ( like on Law & Order). It is a rather nvolved multiparty system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.