What @nytimes calls "weaponized free speech"--it's not in the opinion section, so I'm attributing it to the paper--sounds a lot like upholding individual rights, even in cases where political causes you support find it inconvenient.
Unsettlingly illiberal.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/30/us/politics/first-amendment-conservatives-supreme-court.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news …
0 replies
1 retweet
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.