If Harry Reid does something you think is bad, you have to do something worse. No way around it. You have no choice. Your decision’s not your responsibility. It’s his.https://twitter.com/asymmetricinfo/status/1012040040111845376 …
-
Show this thread
-
The prevalence of this Harry Reid filibuster take is amazing. I wouldn’t have thought anyone really believed it, but it just keeps coming up, including from some smart people. Motivated reasoning + information bubble = unexamined conviction
1 reply 6 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Reid nuked the filibuster for non-Supreme Court noms after GOP filibustered all of them, without exception, regardless of qualifications, and would not cut a deal. What were Democrats supposed to do? Respond to this unprecedented move by leaving every judicial vacancy open?
2 replies 4 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Both sides play politics with judicial noms Democrats started filibustering all of Bush's court noms. But when GOP responded by threatening to nuke filibuster, Dems cut a deal, let some judges through. If they didn't deal, you really think GOP would've kept filibuster? Should've?
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Here's the reality: As partisanship increased, both parties increasingly obstructed nominations. The judicial filibuster was a dead letter. As soon as the minority used it to block a Supreme Court nom and refused to deal, the majority would eliminate it. "In sorrow," of course.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
But even if you think Harry Reid indefensibly nuked the filibuster, that doesn't require escalation. Upon winning the Senate, GOP had many options. Reverse Reid's action, follow it directly, work to restore compromise on judicial noms, etc. They're responsible for their choice.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Dems screwed up by filibustering Gorsuch. It’s all on them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
How? You really think when they filibustered this next nomination that Senate Republicans would've let it go, leaving the seat vacant until a Democrat wins the presidency, rather than just nuke it then?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.