Will disagree vehmently there. An illegitimate, corrupt President CANNOT be allowed to successfully Supreme Court justices. The long-term damage to the country from such appointments almost certainly outweighs the damage done by a comparatively brief Supreme Court vacancy
-
-
This isn't about whether it CAN be done; my issue is with your proposition that 0% of people believe an unfilled Supreme Court vacancy is a good thing. In these circumstances, vacancy is vastly preferable to Gorsuch or worse until the GOP is destroyed in its current incarnation
-
Ah, got it. My point is no one believes an unfilled SC vacancy is a good thing *on principle.* Meaning, those who think it's a good thing do so because of circumstances, and would change in different circumstances. But some still claim it's principle. That's who I'm criticizing.
-
Oh. Well, then allow me to vehemently agree!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.