His use of "invade" is troubling. How long before he's advocating war against said "invaders"?
-
-
-
Agreed. Like comparing migrants to vermin ("infest"). It's a common precursor to atrocity. After all, if they're subhuman, they don't deserve human rights, let alone judges or trials. Not saying it'll go that far, or that anyone wants it to. But similar enough to raise concern.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, if Trump acted the way he spoke he would be a tyrant. But Trump has said this type of stuff since the primaries (he would make the military commit war crimes). I believe such language matters, which is one reason I didn't vote for him, but actions matter more when it comes
-
to someone who is understood to be a like a circus pitchman
-
I partially disagree. Sometimes words are just words. But sometimes they're preludes to actions. The family separation policy is a good example: A serious action that followed a lot of words some people said we shouldn't take seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I joke that my checked-out friends think of me as "hair on fire" due to my constant reminders of what the dictator-wannabe is doing. But I'm wondering if they're now going to realize it's not my smoldering hair they're smelling, but the burning country around us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's referring to the first amendment of the Secret Constitution, popularly known as the "brown people need not apply" amendment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.