Ah no. SCOTUS defined them. The limit is obviously not a cake pal. America won.
-
-
-
Read up on it a little. The court made the decision very narrow, focusing specifically on how the Colorado Civil Rights Commission exhibited anti-religious bias in their process of levying the fine. Explicitly says the ruling does not apply to other cases. Q's remain unanswered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fundamentally, it should be where the line impacts another individual. Does my religion say you can't do something? I can't impose that on you. Does my doing something for you run counter to my faith? Then I shouldn't render such services to the public at large.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't agree. Religious protections extend to practice. But which religion teaches you must not do business with [someone you view as] a sinner? That's not religion; that's culture war.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here are some examples, when the belief denies access to offered public services/accommodations, if it forms the basis of a contract against public policy (ex.housing), if it essentially denies others their legal privileges/immunities guaranteed by the State.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Religious beliefs are one thing, but acting out on such beliefs in contravention of the law is something quite different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Boycott businesses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.