Felt the same way about Iran. Right?
-
-
-
No. Because Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons. North Korea does.
-
I guess the media had it wrong when they say, "Iran's nuclear deal" ... maybe their nuclear program wasnt nuclear enough for denuclearization? Definitions seem to be muddy here.
-
It’s colloquially called the Iran nuclear deal because it involved Iran’s supplies of nuclear material and nuclear infrastructure. But Iran didn’t have nuclear weapons when it signed the deal (still doesn’t). North Korea has nuclear weapons now. Big difference.
-
Yes having them vs working towards it is a big difference. However, thats a non sequitur argument if we are talking about the definition of, "denuclearization"
-
In North Korea’s case, denclearization means, at a minimum, forfeiting all nuclear weapons, allowing inspections to demonstrate it is not building more, and rejoining the NPT.
-
Youre right. Iran is/was more likely to adhere to their agreement.https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-30/israel-exposes-iran-nuclear-lies-and-limits-of-u-s-intelligence …
-
I didn't say that. I made a prediction about whether or not North Korea will denuclearize. What do you expect to happen with North Korea?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.