Morbidly fascinating 1) Trump writes “who does not exist” in reference to person who does, in fact, exist 2) Reporters say denying this real person’s existence is a lie 3) MUST DEFEND TRUMP/ATTACK MEDIA 4) Pretend “who” refers to date or quote, not person 5) “Argument” spreadshttps://twitter.com/blueboxdave/status/1000712903224385536 …
Probably won’t happen (“unlikely”) is different from definitely won’t happen (“impossible”). “Who” refers to people, not dates, words, or probabilities. These aren’t mutually exclusive. Why are you defending the latter error? Why not just criticize the former?
-
-
Because there exists no White House official who suggested what the Times claims was suggested.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.