Should America ban civilian ownership of assault style rifles?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol getting technical with the arms thing. You can get beat with a fork. Guess what, now it’s an assault fork. Better yet it was used as a weapon so there ya go. Assault weapon.
-
-
"Arms"
#2A for militia service were whatever arms the average army foot soldier of the era carries. In 1788 it was the musket because that is what the average army foot soldier carried—the Red Coat. In 2030 the average army foot soldier does not carry a musket or utensils.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Militiamen would not use forks to: 1.) “execute the Laws” 2.) “suppress insurrections” 3.) “repel invasions” ART I, § 8, CL 15
-
Look the forks comment was for the asshat in prior comments. Twitter just felt my comment should be on yours. I’m not against arming Americans. I’m for it. No need to correct me. But in reality, you can pick anything up and consider it a weapon.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No one can kill 20 people from 100 feet away with a fork. Unless they using it to pull the trigger on an semi auto assault rifle, or shorting out a line of life support systems no, not even the last one, they got emergency batteries :-p
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.