@NASAWebbTelescp Hi! Doing some *urgent* fact checking for our JWST film! How many years have been spent building it please?! Thank you!
-
-
Replying to @KeatonStone
@Keaton_S We started studies in 1995, and chose prime contractor in 2002. (I am sitting with John Mather now and that was from him!)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NASAWebb
@NASAWebbTelescp And detect objects 100 times fainter than those detected by Hubble please? Thanks v.much!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KeatonStone
@Keaton_S Better to say JWST is 100 times more powerful than Hubble and most of that power comes from seeing wavelengths Hubble can't!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NASAWebb
@NASAWebbTelescp 100 X more powerful then! Appreciate your help! Last 1! I worked out each mirror segment is 34.7kg - sounds light - but ok?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @KeatonStone
@Keaton_S Let me doublecheck. They are indeed very light.
10:24 AM - 26 Nov 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.