The next 1000X crypto probably won’t be a dApp platform, just like the next Bitcoin wasn’t another cryptocurrency. My thesis is that it’s one of these categories - 1. Stablecoins 2. Oracles 3. Interoperability 4. DEX protocols. Luckily unlike VC, crypto needs are more obvious.
-
-
That doesn't matter. All that matters is that you hit your goals.
-
The market (and prices) so far have been run up by unsophisticated investors. This is not sustainable, and the next 3 years will be different from the last 3 years.
-
I mean you’re effectively saying either Maker, Basis, Fragments or someone else will be the only 1000X winner. That mindset is the same as a maximalist and that’s why you’ll be wrong.
-
I never said a single project will be the only winner. I said the *biggest* winner among them will be winner-take-most.
-
70-20-6–2-1-1 type distribution
-
I’m not disagreeing with that. I can already see that with ETH and BTC. You said only stablecoins can go 1000X and I think you’ll be wrong. We’re on the road to $4T and more. There’s no way only stablecoins go that high.
-
I never said “only” Stablecoins can do 1000x. I think the Privacy coin winner can also do 1000x. Bitcoin could go 200x. But oracles and DEX will not. The adressable market size isn’t as big as “Money” or a Stores of Value.
-
Alright. Let’s see if ZRX hits $49. It’s $2 now.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.