People who do not hold bitcoin tell you it is broken. They have incentives to say it is broken. Those, like us in nChain who hold, we say it is not broken. Who do you believe? Those with skin in the game, or those who have ETH and not bitcoin...
-
-
Replying to @ProfFaustus
Now now steady on chap. BTC and ETH have entirety different monetary policies. They are not remotely equivalent.
2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
-
Replying to @ProfFaustus
I work on http://Mattereum.com making Ian Grigg's Ricardian contract model work in the modern blockchain environment. Right now, Ethereum is pretty important for that work: it's the only viable platform. I don't see bitcoin growing good smart contracts anytime soon.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @leashless
Well, you have not seen that we have the OP_Codes in BCH going back in May. What Eth can do is a % of what BCH can ;)
1 reply 4 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus
Let me know when you expect to have a high level language that compiles and runs on bitcoin. What's a best guess? 6 months? 2 years? I'm sure it's coming: everything evolves towards programmability. But I've got clients who need systems now, and right now, that means Etherum.
2 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @leashless @ProfFaustus
ETH has begun discussing adopting a BTC-like monetary policy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MustStopMurad @ProfFaustus
Again, show don't tell :-) it may never happen.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Proof of Stake systems need to be valuable to be secure. This means underlying asset needs to be a Store of Value. If you have 2% inflation, people will use BTC or something less inflationary to Store Value, not ETH. ETH is realizing this now, and lowering inflation...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.