What may look like unending technical arguments amongst blockchain tribalists, no-coiners, bag holders, technologists, etc are really just clashes of human temperaments. Each has their specific orientation towards the world, values, and domains of expertise.
-
-
Which group specifically?
-
The whole set
-
tribalists in the most positive sense know a lot about their project, its context, unique history(genesis), and a unique value proposition or differentiator; each chain can be seen to have an emergent meta-personality or personal value structure
-
nocoiners in the most positive sense have knowledge about the existing social structures and rightly skeptical about most projects that use the word "blockchain"
-
bgholders are fully in the "game" they at least have skin, some may have soul in the game; in the most positive sense bc of their intense exposure they often have the most unique information about the intersection of markets(moods/sentiments/structure) and the projects themselves
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.