@TaylorPearsonMe really enjoyed this, but have questions / comments:
1) A flow chart visualizing the different parties and their actions would be extremely helpful
2) Why do the tokens you issue have value if no interest? Are they just ZC Treasury STRIPS?https://taylorpearson.me/blockchain-supply-chain-use-cases/ …
-
Show this thread
-
3) enforcement of the rights of the (disparate) tokenholders is a big issue. 4) does this system pervert incentives so your "tokenholders" will want you to default (history of mortgage / property law / redemption suggests maybe)?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
5) I get that putting these asset(s) on the blockchain removes the need for a trusted bank. However, you've now placed the onus of valuing HardyMansionCoin on each of my trading partners. Esoteric asset valuation is likely not their core competency.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
8) "The entity loaning money for new piece of equipment can already see on the blockchain an order from Starbucks to buy the coffee, so that they can lend at a much lower rate bc of lower risk." ^ This is a v different use case from doing ABL w yourself on chain, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @CantHardyWait
Supply chain opportunity isn’t anywhere near the trillions. It’s probably in the millions or low billions. Just because a market is a certain size doesn’t mean it will be captured, and doesn’t mean that any supply chain cryptoassets will be massively valuable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The only thing in this whole wave that will be in the double digit trillions is the reinvention of money. Things that will *bite* into gold and fiat. Utility tokens, security tokens, discount tokens... they ARE NOTHING compared to the reinvention of money.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.