I strongly suspect this problem will be solved by adding custodians, I've thought about it very hard off and on over the last 2-3 years and that's the best I could come up with, the cryptography cannot change.
There is a possibility it becomes more decentralized with time. Remember it was only launched late 2016.
-
-
Then it will be something else. It might still be called Zcash for marketing purposes. I don't know a single digital currency today, which is not logically centralized.https://twitter.com/nivertech/status/894043269415534592 …
-
1) Which is the *most* decentralized thus far in your opinion? 2) And why do you think it is *still*, nevertheless centralized?
-
1. I have a lecture on this subject. In short u need to give up on either consensus or scalability to be fully decentralized. Can't have all 3 2. Using Satoshi's design is a lower-hanging fruit. It's easier to ignore Scalability & claim that you are "Decentralized", see #1.pic.twitter.com/eCjA4GDVUZ
-
what do you mean by giving up consensus? do you mean employing bitcoin's P2P "network governance" as opposed to a formal process or do you mean something else entirely?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
