1/ Exactly. I never understood why companies cannot build so-called "tokenized services" directly on top of established tokens such as BTC (yes, BTC was the original token). The whole category of "utility tokens" just doesn't make any sense.https://twitter.com/MaxFangX/status/976031730460012545 …
-
-
More importantly, a global currency will be much bigger and hence a lot less riskier than small national ones
-
I don't think that is true at all. Its an assertion. Diverse divisions can be a form of decentralization.
-
borders create hundreds of currencies and cyberspace doesn’t need either
-
different currencies are useful for different things and it has always been that way and there is nothing to suggest that will change.
-
Different currencies are only used to do business with companies in foreign land Imagine a world without borders u can have 1-3 currencies there instead of 200 Minecraft or World of Warcraft don’t have 200 currencies and they work fine borders create too many currencies
-
We are decades if not centuries away from a borderless world. I wouldn’t hold my breath for a global currency anytime soon.
-
The Internet is already borderless. If BTC or a Stablecoin reaches 10 Trillion, there is your global currency. One DAO can pay another DAO in it. No fiat.
-
Fiat will still exist and altcoins will also still exist @ bitcoin = 10 trillion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.