1/ Exactly. I never understood why companies cannot build so-called "tokenized services" directly on top of established tokens such as BTC (yes, BTC was the original token). The whole category of "utility tokens" just doesn't make any sense.https://twitter.com/MaxFangX/status/976031730460012545 …
-
-
You haven't given any reasoning as to why the laws of economics implying the advent of crypto means for the first time in our history we will have 1 or 3 currencies only.
-
Global currency reduces frictions of unneccessary exchange
-
More importantly, a global currency will be much bigger and hence a lot less riskier than small national ones
-
I don't think that is true at all. Its an assertion. Diverse divisions can be a form of decentralization.
-
borders create hundreds of currencies and cyberspace doesn’t need either
-
different currencies are useful for different things and it has always been that way and there is nothing to suggest that will change.
-
Different currencies are only used to do business with companies in foreign land Imagine a world without borders u can have 1-3 currencies there instead of 200 Minecraft or World of Warcraft don’t have 200 currencies and they work fine borders create too many currencies
-
We are decades if not centuries away from a borderless world. I wouldn’t hold my breath for a global currency anytime soon.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.