If your blockchain 3.0 project competes against ETH but doesn't have a way to beat ETH's developer traction you have massive execution risk. Scalability won't be enough. Neither will formal verification. Neither will onchain governance. Recruit developers not investors.
-
-
Replying to @RyanSAdams
You overestimate the network effects around ETH. If a project comes that is 100x+ faster, App (not protocol) developers, have the option to jump ship instantly. The moats in blockchain world aren’t that intense
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MustStopMurad @RyanSAdams
There is no option to jump ship instantly when development has already started on a certain platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RamiJuvonen @RyanSAdams
Many of the upcoming Ethereum competitors claim to allow smart contract development in multiple established programming languages. Also, which *killer* world-shattering dApp is set to launch on Ethereum before the end of 2018? We are still early
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MustStopMurad @RyanSAdams
It is not just about language. If u switch platform, u need to re-test everything. No-one knows what will be the killer apps and when. That should be pretty obvious...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RamiJuvonen @RyanSAdams
Without massive throughput, you aren't going to have ANY killer apps at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MustStopMurad @RyanSAdams
and without live mainnet, you aren't going to have ANY dapps at all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Programmable blockchains are 3 years old. Give it some time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.