If your blockchain 3.0 project competes against ETH but doesn't have a way to beat ETH's developer traction you have massive execution risk. Scalability won't be enough. Neither will formal verification. Neither will onchain governance. Recruit developers not investors.
-
-
There is no option to jump ship instantly when development has already started on a certain platform.
-
Many of the upcoming Ethereum competitors claim to allow smart contract development in multiple established programming languages. Also, which *killer* world-shattering dApp is set to launch on Ethereum before the end of 2018? We are still early
-
It is not just about language. If u switch platform, u need to re-test everything. No-one knows what will be the killer apps and when. That should be pretty obvious...
-
Without massive throughput, you aren't going to have ANY killer apps at all.
-
and without live mainnet, you aren't going to have ANY dapps at all
-
Programmable blockchains are 3 years old. Give it some time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
99% of projects that might be "100x" faster achieve it by sacrificing security and taking shortcuts which just won't do for the future of the web.
-
Ethereum doesn't have a good track record of security so far and others haven't launched yet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.