Yes,sure,I just gave you the most recent-Carney's speech was today('The hierarchy points to the reality that money is a social convention').As I said,my sources have little to do with economics,but are in anthropology/sosical studies.See 'discussion' above, David Graeber's work.
in this thread above you say uoa comes from sov, but the boe paper you link explicitly states sov->moe->uoa
-
-
No, that's not what the paragraph is saying. What it is saying is, there are many things that can be of 'value'. some of them can also be mediums of exchange, but if they are not unit of account, then they are worthless as money:UoA allows MoE and thus creates objective value.
-
It says: “For an asset to be considered a unit of account it must be used as a medium of exchange by many people”. This means that you need to have MoE properties first before UoA discussion can even begin.
-
UoA requires MoE MoE requires SoV
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.