For the record it was 100% proposed by Pierre, I should have mentioned this in the talk. He deserves the conceptual credit.
-
-
-
Enjoyable read, great stuff all
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the idea behind all this is simpler than all that TA fuzziness: - When MV < RV most investments are losing money. - Given the long term price trend, and the increasing amount of old coins, bottoms of MVRV are increasingly higher.
-
Measuring MV as a percentage over or under RV may be a better way to reflect average market P&L for different windows of time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is great, thank you! My interpretation is that it shows the collective cost basis or "pain point". Actual realized value would probably be higher if the lost coin wallets were subtracted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Awesome! When do we get a twitter feed with MV/RV in it? (similar to
@TIPMayerMultple)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about taking the log of that ratio? Would it make the ackumulation areas look as dramatic as the tops? Perhaps that would be a fair way to stretch of the metric?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.