Bitcoin maximalism sounds like contradiction - literally same arguments for SoW may be applied to gold, yet people aren't buying gold and causing hyperinflation in well managed economies...
@MustStopMurad
-
-
That being said, it *is* zero-sum. Bitcoin can only go above $50T+ if other monetary and fin. instruments suffer. It will "absorb" wealth from other assets. I roughly think: 90%+ of fiat, 60%+ of metals, 10%+ of debt, 5%+ of real estate, 5%+ of stocks, etc. Fiat inflated latter
-
If BTC absorbs 90%+of fiat, then wouldn’t it have to absorb more than 10% of treasury debt issued in that same fiat currency? If fiat falls 90%+ then the interest on fiat treasury debt would be phenomenal to compensate?
-
Fiat value depends on governments ability to tax people - it cannot be captured - it would just evaporate... But what would be % portfolio allocation of people in such case?
-
There is an old Jewish proverb: store 1/3 of your wealth in money (gold), 1/3 in land, 1/3 in business. I think the wealthy people hold far less than 33% of their wealth in cash today because that is constantly getting printed but post-hyperbitcoinization would be closer to 30%
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.