Exchange costs do not naturally go to 0. At a minimum, they have to pay the market maker to hold a risky inventory.
-
-
Since gold approximates inflation over the long term, would a CPI-esque basket of commodities not accomplish the same thing?
-
No, because Bitcoin has a superior stock-to-flow ratio over *any* commodity in the world.
-
That is true and of course only getting better. If we suppose that tokenization does eliminate the transactional demand for money, any figures on how large the remaining asset demand for money as a store of value would be?
-
Actually I believe if Bitcoin succeeds in its fixed-supply form, the total amount of wealth held in it, in 2018 USD terms, will be higher than $90T currently held in Fiat. Think about it. If $90T is held in inflationary/dilutable/depreciating instruments today, how big BTC'll be.
-
real estate, stocks, bonds etc. right now are overvalued because fiat is shit
-
I would could certainly settle for that
. Is $90T total current supply? I’m wondering how big of a subtraction transactional demand is. Also, gold was about 30% of total supply under the gold standard due to fractionalized fiat overlays. So $30T-ish? -
I think BTC will be $140T-$200T
-
So total collapse of fiat? Why wouldn’t fiat simply harden and retain some value via a Nash ideal money scenario?
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.