With the limitations of expandability (aka too massive energy consumption if brought to tradable size) I think that bitcoin stands a little chance of making it to the big boys league. The fed is already dumping 40bil a month in QT, I'd say that's the big boys league.
you can't have "blockchain" without an underlying currency. but I don't have time to teach you the basics.
-
-
Did I say any different? I said blockchain yes, bitcoin maybe not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why store wealth in Fedcoin which expands at 6% per year instead of BTC which will expand at <0.7% per year soon?
-
Because you might not have a legal right to store your wealth anywhere else. Let's just face it, we are on totally different pages in terms of issues vs opportunities. I'm happy to agree to disagree. In ten years or so, we'll see. Happy to be wrong as well.
-
quite a totalitarian view. cryptocurrencies are just software. just a database with 1s and 0s. difficult to stop entirely
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.