23/ BTC is superior to e.g., ETH in most if not all of the above.
Hashrate going up fast now that ASICs are involved. Trusted Setup dangers are overexaggerated. They have 30+ participants now, and as long as 1 is honest there is no problem. They all have to collude for there to be a problem, which is absurd.
-
-
Finally, if/when they move to STARKS, there is no trusted setup involved.
-
sure, in the future zec may be good money, but to recommend it at this stage as sound money over etc makes no sense to me
-
Later it might not be as cheap anymore. This inflationary, pre-Overwinter, pre-Zcon0, pre-Sapling, pre-mandatory privacy, pre-great UX, pre-Wallets with Z-txs, pre-STARKs even, might be a good time to invest in some.
-
I thought we were talking about sound money properties not investment opportunities... US based company centralising the decision making and development of a form of sound money? there are plenty better options
-
"Centralize then Decentralize" is the only way to even think about challenging bigger coins, especially if you are dealing with complex cutting-edge technology. This allows you to be more nimble and work faster to catch up, early on. Zero knowledge cryptography isn't simple.
-
sure but future promises are plenty. I'm sure there's a fixed cap xmr fork somewhere, nano is capped and instant, litecoin, etc. it's fine if you brought it up cause you believe in it, but I found it odd you put it next to BTC as 2 forms of sound money. zec is still a young alt
-
Nano, Litecoin, Ripple, Stellae, IOTA are all obsoleted by the Lightning Network. ZEC privacy guarantees are stronger than XMR’s.
-
this is a huge speculation. LN now and in the near future is only for very small transactions and if it ever goes beyond that the fees will likely reflect it. what's wrong with Monero's privacy?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.