robust non-collateralized Stablecoins + non-custodial DEXs + dark pools + atomic swaps + physically distributed orderbooks + protocol interoperability + guaranteed-privacy coins + continuous work to make all of the above un-shut-down-able. Juicy Synergy
-
-
ETH could beat BTC in the SoV race, but the % probability is like 10% chance, not 45% chance like the market is implying. (delusional market)
-
Come to the dark side. We have cookies.
-
Also, the Bitcoin developers are *the* most talented team in the space and there is zero argument about it. You don't appreciate the conservatism, hypersecurity and hyperdecentralization ideals of Bitcoin (sound money) and are exhibiting high time preference with "Moar features".
-
This is a precarious, fragilizing standpoint though. If ever, for whatever reason, Bitcoin's SoV properties are 'copied' (and believe me, everyone is trying) then Bitcoin will have lost its competitive advantage, and will be behind in all the other important areas.
-
The price drop won't be gradual, but it will be a sudden sharp decline as Bitcoin goes from SoV to completely useless.
-
You can’t “copy” the devs, time, brand, Lindy effect, battle scars, UASF. ETH can’t copy Bitcoin’s more secure blockchain structure. ETH doesn’t even have proper full nodes. ICO scams, MoE and contracts are FAR easier to copy than BTC qualities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Frictionless interoperability between utility protocols, such as Ethereum, will most likely reduce switching costs between networks and increase velocity of protocol-native tokens, which will result in lower a token value.
-
If token value is too low, network cannot get secured, and miners might switch to a fee-model, which will likely be denominated in the dominant SOV-protocol, i.e., bitcoin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.