You described one as having an emergent consumer protection feature, with the other having an emergent pyramid scheme feature...?https://twitter.com/MustStopMurad/status/1000892680275136512 …
Gawker was trash. Silver has 50x the amount of industrial uses than Gold. All monetary premia residing within these metals would be shuffled post-EMP.
-
-
That's an opinion; how can one applaud uncensorable money and applaud a capitalist that used their capital to censor and displace journalists they didn't like? You're also assuming that people will magically become practical and smarter once the internet goes out
-
Dude. Gawker were a bunch of shitty gossip spreaders. They added nothing to the world. They weren’t Pulitzer Prize winning journalists journalists. They were a glorified TMZ.
-
Also an opinion; they made content that attracted readers, which was their job. Are you saying only Pulitzer-winning journalists are immune from capitalist censorship, or that sites like TMZ (but not TMZ) should be censored? People make sweeping generalizations about BTC too
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.