Op-Ed on the anti-democratic shenanigans of both parties, presumably in order to save our democracy. From supporting debate dodgers to embracing the most ludicrous of carpetbaggers. Op-Ed focused on the former.http://helenair.com/tncms/asset/editorial/ad9d97f0-a89b-52f4-811f-199e88ef78c1 …
-
Comparing Bullock to authoritarian leaders is a bit of a stretch there bud. I'm sure you've met Bullock before & I doubt you feel he's a ruthless sociopath like the autocrats mentioned in the op ed. Why paint him as such when this election is about stopping fascism in the U.S.
Thanks for your point. That wasn’t my intention. But let’s not walk down a long trend line that lands at the conclusion of no debates. Politico has a good article about this. The powerful are increasingly saying no to debates, as that remains the challenger’s only small chance.
-
-
I agree that debates are vital for democracy and would have watched or listened to you and Bullock. I know what's at stake if we don't stop DT & his transnational crime syndicate & that anxiety caused me to interpret your op ed as sour grapes, two weeks out from an election.
-
That’s because it was sour grapes & whining before an election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.