stop banging this stupid drum, no one needs any of themhttps://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1161702152684953604 …
-
Bullock is simply way stronger. None of these suggestions, while credible candidates, do really have a chance barring a Daines scandal or somenthing of that sort. In such a state Democrats can't win with credible candidates. They need great ones.
Bullock is strongest with big war chest, no question. But hope is not a plan. That's why I'm running. Because the others can't win and I can. Have you looked into @MuesforMontana background? Not too many in entire U.S. Senate have that resume.
-
-
Background doesn't really matter. You can't win either, I'm sorry. No one with not even 2k followers a year and a half from election day can beat a US Senator. It's not possible. Bullock can win because he's popular and has won statewide. Even he would be an underdog though.
-
We just announced, GR. And you need to take a statistics course. And you don't know Montana, or an unknown farmer from the hi-line who revolutionized Montana politics. Btw, he thinks we can win and has supported.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.