Meanwhile, China (and many researchers) is disputing the hypothesis that the wet 'n' wild market is the source of this virus at all.
-
-
-
You think they'd rather admit it was a lab accident?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The first time I saw you, I *really* liked you.
The more I *hear* you, the more I really love and respect you. Keep being level headed and please keep yourself and your family safe. The country can use more voices like yours. -
That's very kind of you!

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would argue that "wet 'n' wild" markets in China are the result of government intervention. It has been a government controlled monopoly on traditional livestock that has forced regular farmers to raise bats and other animals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, maybe more pressure on China on wet markets and re-evaluation of our own slaughterhouse practices in West.
-
And over use of anti biotics . Social distancing for livestock = give them more space .
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Good point!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read that the wet markets were regulated into existence because regular bore so many food born illnesses because of old food being sold. Thus, "wet" markets were created to show how fresh the product was as its slaughtered in front of the customer.
-
And the reason traditional markets were so bad was due to heavy handed regulations in the production of livestock.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.