As I said before, criminal Justice reform is like the clean air act reforms in LA years ago. Science and data led the way. And people were able to breath again. They reimagined Los Angeles, and over time, things became more and more clear. It was, and now is, the right approach.
-
-
Replying to @JesseJe99650584 @GeorgeGascon
No data and definitely no science backing
@GeorgeGascon@chesaboudin just radical progressives who are angry at society.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Mr_S3lfDestruct @JesseJe99650584 and
The science doesn't exist if you don't read ithttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0032885511415224 …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @oklalp @Mr_S3lfDestruct and
Did you actually read this? Or just cut and paste google? My guess is the latter.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @markbgger @oklalp and
You sent me an article with an abstract only (through a subscription paywall). However I was able to find the article. On P3, authors also admit that findings are variable quality and existing research is in short supply. They also admit that incapacitation works.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @markbgger @oklalp and
Most studies say the same thing about excessively long sentences. that there's insufficient data but a growing number of academics and scholars professors and studies are leaning towards shorter sentences and more rehabilitation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JesseJe99650584 @markbgger and
I don't know but the facts speak for themselves. The longer the stay the less likely they will be reconvicted withing 3 years.pic.twitter.com/J3qBthXySe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Mr_S3lfDestruct @markbgger and
Dude. This chart just proves our point. Those with 15 years in prison had the lowest recidivism rate. A benchmark mr. Gascon consistently refers to. The high recidivism rates is only for 6 to 18-month sentences. The excessive sentencing were trying to reform are way longer
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JesseJe99650584 @markbgger and
Lol. 15 years is not a benchmark it is a maximum for murder. Everything else gets the minimum. 5 years for rape. 3 years for armed robbery. 6 years for attempted murder. And you cut all of those in half if you factor in parole. Which he says everyone should get.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Mr_S3lfDestruct @markbgger and
Big game James worthy. You're constantly missing layups. The maximum for murder is the death penalty. The minimum for first-degree is 25 to life. Murders in LA county are getting at least that or more. The other charges deputy DA's have discretion for the low, mid or high term.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
25 to life means eligible for parole in 12.5 years and the DA will not show up to the parole hearing.
-
-
Replying to @Mr_S3lfDestruct @markbgger and
No it does not. Please research more.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.