Profile of a second year junior attending: "Dr. Vinay Prasad is a professional scold...Anyone is fair game for his ire." Keeping the discourse polite and avoiding ad hominems from the beginning?
-
-
Show this thread
-
Is this good? "While he takes issue with Prasad’s style, Topol is a fan overall."
Show this thread -
Evolution, maturation, or simply defending Ioannidis?https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/27/hear-scientists-different-views-covid-19-dont-attack-them/ …
Show this thread -
Perhaps the post-Covid Prasad wouldn't block everyone who dares to push back against his never-in-doubt polemics, wouldn't assume the worst about everyone's motives?
Show this thread -
Now, while I know they didn't write the headline, should clinicians with no direct knowledge of the actual case, no review of records or direct knowledge of the true history, write about whether care performed by a colleague was appropriate?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-bushs-unnecessary-heart-surgery/2013/08/09/c91c439c-0041-11e3-9a3e-916de805f65d_story.html …
Show this thread -
Questioning clinical judgement and motives without facts in a national op-ed? How does that compare to "tagging" an employer? I'd stay away from both, frankly.
Show this thread -
An oncology fellow commenting on the cardiac care provided without any first hand knowledge of the case in the Washington Post? Huh?
Show this thread -
Same fellow? "When major decisions must be made amid high scientific uncertainty, as is the case with Covid-19, we can’t afford to silence or demonize professional colleagues with heterodox views...
Show this thread -
...Even worse, we can’t allow questions of science, medicine, and public health to become captives of tribalized politics. Today, more than ever, we need vigorous academic debate."
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.