@TeamYouTube
For example, say someone verifies the vid is ad friendly, then it gets flagged, and a manual review requested.
Upon manual review, it IS deemed "not suitable".
That YouTuber could get a strike.
We have such strikes for copyright claims and such. Why not this?
@TeamYouTube
Further, *if* such a video is flagged this way, creators should be given the benefit of the doubt, and ads should remain. After all, this program is still learning, and is *not* at all reliable yet.
-
-
@TeamYouTube Upon manual review, *then* the video could be deemed as suitable or not suitable by a human. In this method 1) Revenue is not wrongly missed out on by the creators nor by YouTube. 2) The system still learns just as much. 3) Creators are not devalued/disrespected. -
@TeamYouTube I'm not trying to sound angry with that #3. Believe me, I fully sympathize, you guys are HARD WORKING employees. I imagine your job is not easy, and often thankless. (So let me say it here, THANK YOU for what you do and go through!) - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
And what you state makes logical sense. The system needs time and data to learn. *Perfectly* reasonable.