Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
MrLundScience's profile
Rich Lund
Rich Lund
Rich Lund
@MrLundScience

Tweets

Rich Lund

@MrLundScience

I believe science belongs to everyone, and I won't be satisfied until you believe it too.

Michigan
youtube.com/MrLundScience
Joined April 2015

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 13 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet

      @TeamYouTube For example, say someone verifies the vid is ad friendly, then it gets flagged, and a manual review requested. Upon manual review, it IS deemed "not suitable". That YouTuber could get a strike. We have such strikes for copyright claims and such. Why not this?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 13 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet

      @TeamYouTube If a YouTuber shows evidence of verifying vids that shouldn't be verified, *then* their videos could lose ad privileges. This system seems logical, would solve the current problem for the innocent YouTuber, and keep sponsors happy too.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 13 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet

      @TeamYouTube We're supposedly partners. Why aren't we treated that way? Also, with this idea, YouTube itself would stop losing out on potential revenue. Please. Discuss this. Don't keep us in the dark. Tell us something. Let us know you care. Thank you.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    4. TeamYouTube‏Verified account @TeamYouTube 13 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience

      Appreciate your sending us your feedback on this. Our systems need millions of human-reviewed data points to improve and that takes time, with every video it understand nuances better. Please continue to appeal as this helps.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @TeamYouTube

      Hey @TeamYouTube, I want to thank you for a genuine reply that didn't just suggest I request a manual review. That truly is appreciated very much.🙏 And what you state makes logical sense. The system needs time and data to learn. *Perfectly* reasonable.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube Can I point out one more thing to be considered, though: In a roundabout way, you are also stating that your system is still learning, and isn't where it needs to be yet. If it's flagging a science video that has no talking, nothing even close to questionable...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube ...then it's quite far away from being ready to do the job it's intended to do. I agree, it needs practice to learn. But in the meantime, *while it's learning*, should it be implemented to do a job it's not ready for yet?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube There's a *simple* solution that all involved would benefit from. We are asked many things when uploading vids. Has it appeared on TV. Should it have an age restriction. Etc. *Why not* also ask us at that time to verify that it's suitable for all advertisers?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube Creators could have the options of "Yes, suitable for all advertisers" or "Might not be suitable for all advertisers" or "Not suitable for most advertisers". Then, let the video be published...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube And *if* the creator already verified it as suitable for all ads, *and* it gets flagged as not suitable by the systems, you can automatically have it be in a category of needing to be manually reviewed, without the creator needing to see that and do something.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

      @TeamYouTube Further, *if* such a video is flagged this way, creators should be given the benefit of the doubt, and ads should remain. After all, this program is still learning, and is *not* at all reliable yet.

      10:14 AM - 14 Jan 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

          @TeamYouTube Upon manual review, *then* the video could be deemed as suitable or not suitable by a human. In this method 1) Revenue is not wrongly missed out on by the creators nor by YouTube. 2) The system still learns just as much. 3) Creators are not devalued/disrespected.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Rich Lund‏ @MrLundScience 14 Jan 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @MrLundScience @TeamYouTube

          @TeamYouTube I'm not trying to sound angry with that #3. Believe me, I fully sympathize, you guys are HARD WORKING employees. I imagine your job is not easy, and often thankless. (So let me say it here, THANK YOU for what you do and go through!)

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. 5 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info