@TeamYouTube
I upload a science video on liquid oxygen.
There's zero talking.
Text only describes the Chemistry.
Only body part shown is a hand.
How is this "not suitable for most advertisers"?
Do you know what flags such vids?
Do you admit there's a problem w/ your algorithm?
@TeamYouTube
Why have us verify the video only *after* being published, and *after* the problem has happened? Can't we have some benefit of the doubt, until we demonstrate we don't deserve it?
-
-
@TeamYouTube For example, say someone verifies the vid is ad friendly, then it gets flagged, and a manual review requested. Upon manual review, it IS deemed "not suitable". That YouTuber could get a strike. We have such strikes for copyright claims and such. Why not this?Show this thread -
@TeamYouTube If a YouTuber shows evidence of verifying vids that shouldn't be verified, *then* their videos could lose ad privileges. This system seems logical, would solve the current problem for the innocent YouTuber, and keep sponsors happy too.Show this thread -
@TeamYouTube We're supposedly partners. Why aren't we treated that way? Also, with this idea, YouTube itself would stop losing out on potential revenue. Please. Discuss this. Don't keep us in the dark. Tell us something. Let us know you care. Thank you.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.