It seems as though you either can’t or won’t provide reasonable justification in response to my request, ie the two points I listed above. Care to try?
I know you gents say baptism is not circumcision, yet all your defences for paedobaptism are based on the Abrahamic rite. Go figure. Cognitive dissonance there. It's just like the crazy claim that PB is not hereditary! Of course it is!
-
-
ZERO of my defenses of PB are based on the Abrahamic rite. These claims of your fascinate me. You are so enamored by your own conceits that you leave no room for conversation. You expect everyone to see what you see, and insult them if they can’t see through your disability
-
Really? All of the "infant" texts that you gents rely upon come from the Abrahamic covenant. That is what your fictional "covenant membership" and "covenant children" are based on. I've read the books.
-
I’ve been an advocate of PC for 15 years and have never once appealed to Calvinist paradigms about so-called “covenant theology” to defend it. I’m not Reformed, which helps a little
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.