Probably because the RT audience score means nothing since anyone can leave a rating (whether they’ve seen the film or not) and since not everyone who sees a given movie makes the effort to go there to vote.
This is VERY INTERESTING!! On @RottenTomatoes, the critics rating for #Venom
is only 30% (rotten!), but the audience score is a big 88%! By contrast, critics gave #FirstMan
88% (certified Fresh), but the audience score is lower at 62%! Why the disconnect??pic.twitter.com/g8NPrhamhK
-
-
-
Yeah I don’t get the obsession over the audience scores since it’s been proven it can be manipulated
-
That's an interesting take BUT I'll go with this WEEKEND ESTIMATES 1.Venom $35,700,000 (2nd weekend) 2.A Star is Born $28,000,000 3.First Man $16,500,000 (1st weekend)
-
And those numbers are actually quantifiable.
-
Do we believe Cinemascore as more or less quantifiable? (I was not surprised to see “First Man” get a B+.)
-
Hard to say. But it's based strictly on opening-night audiences, which doesn't necessarily represent a cross-section of the film's audience in toto.
-
Critics will be critics and the audiences will speak for themselves. Anyway “Hey
@ADuralde when are you and the crew getting#whattheflick on#ApplePodcasts” Miss you all! -
Watch this space.
- еще 2 ответа
Новая переписка -
-
-
Venom is a fun romp and the definition of escapism. First Man is a serious study and deconstruction of American Exceptionalism. I think people are opting for escapism due to what’s going in America right now.
Спасибо. Твиттер использует эту информацию, чтобы сделать вашу ленту лучше. ОтменитьОтменить
-
-
-
Because mainstream audiences want lazy and easily digestible rather than slow and thought-provoking. I wish there was a more complex answer than that, but there isn’t.
-
Or maybe Real Life is stressful enough (eg, politics, harassment, school shootings, crime, natural disasters, etc.) as is and some audiences wanted to escape?
-
Also pretentious people forget that film is both art AND entertainment and some people just want a fun movie that doesn't take itself too seriously. Other people enjoy the best of both worlds, inspite of ignorant generalizations.
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
-
-
Because Rotten Tomato critics have forgotten 1 damn important thing... FUN! & the Audience loved the movie. They also like Avatar Suicide Squad Harry Potter & an endlessly FREAKING IMPORTANT LIST But NO the critics just like being smarty-pants rejects that hear themselvespic.twitter.com/8m93xWGNpU
-
Prisoner of Azkaban has 90%+, Goblet 88%, Avatar 83%.... critic ratings Suicide Squad has 60% Audience rating... What the hell are you talking about? :D Also, critics are not a monolith, they are people who just happen to build a career around writing/talking about films.
-
& the early HP movies??? When it was trying to get off the ground? Or the Twilight series. Critics are often bullies grown up. I have seen some good ones on TM, but I'd rather go to Imdb first, even Wikipedia before TM.
-
Новая переписка -
-
-
Perhaps they didn’t like the portrayal of Armstrong as an emotionally distant, socially troubled human being, or in other words...
#FirstManpic.twitter.com/L2wfxTumtn -
I mean thats what he was like. People don’t wanna accept something that isn’t exactly like what they hope in their head.
-
I didn’t even know what to expect, but I never knew how complicated of a person he was out of the spotlight. It made for a very compelling, emotionally investing experience for me. Many of the scenes with his family were more thrilling than the space-set sequences
-
Absolutley
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
Загрузка может занять некоторое время.
Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.