something i've thought about for a while, and taught about in the past, concerns "free speech." i'm a legal historian by training, so i suppose i could, like "NPR legal analysts," take umbrage at people not understanding what protections the 1A affords them. I don't care abt that
-
-
hey oliver, thanks for this. what do you mean exactly? That we are entering the age of a surveillance state and "free speech" will be impossible?
-
if we want to work a job and have our thoughts be shared and perhaps even speak behind closed or semi closed doors, yes. The sort of corporate HR stuff coming down the line is ideological beyond the workplace, so the workers must be watched beyond the workplace.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I also wonder about evolving corporate standards. Like, my employer sanctions me in 2025 for a Tweet from 2009...
-
Companies will be far less concerned with process and proportionality than courts
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There’s still paper and pens and diaries, desk drawers.
-
Throwing it back , “persecution and the art of writing”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry chief. Having kids is proto-fash and referencing them is dog whistling. Bad look. Do the work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
