two reasons: 1) the first group of people polled on this issue are usually just the typical hobgoblins the NPRerati will cite for any ol' "ignorance quotient" stat (sun orbiting the moon, angels, aliens) 2) the second group perceive that private sector threats to speech matter
-
-
Show this thread
-
this second part, setting aside "1A jurisprudence properly so-called," reflects well-founded folk suspicion that the "HRificiation of the world" (a topic of one of my
@whatisleftpod mini-eps) is underway. they see all the trainings, the deplatformings, etc. they "get it"Show this thread -
ofc you can't "shout fire in a crowded theater" and so on but that *isn't* what this is about, though the television "talking heads" don't focus on this because it's vague, and besides, They Work for a Company Too. But ppl know the world is becoming a Privately Owned Platform
Show this thread -
they can't say it in so many words - why would we expect them to? - but having been spoon or forcefed loads of reprogramming and J Saccoing and so on, they know, deep down, that more is coming. this is laughed off by the ppl who deep down expect to rule this new world.
Show this thread -
ow holmes, the "fire in a crowded theater man," also wrote that "you can't argue a man into liking a glass of beer." soon you won't even be about to argue about the taste of a beer if the beer holds all the right positions and you hold no positions at all, right or otherwise
Show this thread -
and it's not lost on me that these words, which i'll likely recapitulate in a mini-podcast sometime in the future, are right now consigned to a privately-owned platform that doesn't even employ me (for free, the only work I do "pro bono" anywhere)
Show this thread -
eventually,"Kids," you'll have no place where any word cannot be heard, seen, processed, and counted for or against you. we're close to it now. the game is over. the "debate" abt free speech, then, has ended. now we wait and watch and see which technologies effect all this change
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
People always repeat legalistic arguments about the first amendment as though I didn't understand that, but what does it matter if the world is so controlled by a handful of private entities that they enjoy de facto censorship over anything I might say?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is it common knowledge what you are talking about here?
-
In the US context among some folks who follow this, yes
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
