One big change in corporate HR materials is that the work/not-at-work division has almost completely vanished. There are of course federal laws that apply solely to the former, and those are monitored carefully lest a lawsuit ensues, but those are an afterthought now
-
Show this thread
-
The next big change — and I’ve said this before — is targeting behaviors that cannot be confined to the workplace. A “microaggression” is a bad act wherever it happens. If an MA occurs outside of work, it offers proof that it happens inside of work too. And one indicates more
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
A bad act, I should say, that will be regulated by private HR policy, intended to protect the “we the people” who own the company via shares, not the federal law of the “we the people” of constitutional fame. And the former people are much more concerned about PR than the latter
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
WFH offers some "escape" from this, even as the workplace is collapsed into a single space...but only if you work through terse emails, keep phone calls brief, and keep cameras off when on Zoom. But colleagues in other fields tell me they're being mandated to keep cameras on
3 replies 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MoustacheClubUS
I like my camera on as I’ve used my DSLR to get a super crisp image. Flexin’ on fools.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I've got this upgraded audio setup I use now so they don't get any digital distortion from me, whereas they all still sound like Darth Vader
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
