The next big change — and I’ve said this before — is targeting behaviors that cannot be confined to the workplace. A “microaggression” is a bad act wherever it happens. If an MA occurs outside of work, it offers proof that it happens inside of work too. And one indicates more
-
-
Show this thread
-
A bad act, I should say, that will be regulated by private HR policy, intended to protect the “we the people” who own the company via shares, not the federal law of the “we the people” of constitutional fame. And the former people are much more concerned about PR than the latter
Show this thread -
WFH offers some "escape" from this, even as the workplace is collapsed into a single space...but only if you work through terse emails, keep phone calls brief, and keep cameras off when on Zoom. But colleagues in other fields tell me they're being mandated to keep cameras on
Show this thread -
Not to mention I've seen company slack feeds full of personal commentary about all kinds of political and social issues, private lives, etc. The only advantage of work, at least for some folks, was that it used to *not be the home*. But now it is one place, policed, & inescapable
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this prediction is one of the most frighteningly dystopian (for lack of a better word) visions ive seen described since this crisis began. i chortled at "gig policing" jokes but this strikes a chord.
-
It’s already beginning. I do this work
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Emails after 5pm and then responses expected by 10am the next day is fucked, and they're all doing it, and it's being done to them.
-
Yep, even when you're told not to answer, the first thing you're asked about is those emails ("did you see my email? [implication: you're on salary, after all]...")
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
