my dissertation was on education clauses in state constitutions + the history of school finance litigation, but i became disenchanted w/ that topic bc: a) nearly everyone involved w/ that "work" had an obv agenda (fund/defund the schools) b) the schools have always been "failing"
-
Show this thread
-
b) was by far the more fascinating of the two. almost since schooling began in the us, it has been decried by outside observers, even as it was hailed as "essential" or in need of reform. and nearly every reform - centralizing, decentralizing, testing, no testing - has "failed"
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likesShow this thread -
it was a subject that seemed amenable to no answers, just endless kvetching about having more of this and less of that. and, with the rise of "social science" data, any specific method or use of money could be revealed as unhelpful for "student outcomes." nothing worked
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
in spite of that, some kids "learned" anyway, which gave the koch-right a fairly foolproof "nothing matters except the parents" argument, which was inarguable but also not worthy of argument, since the point was to move students past that
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
eventually i read j ranciere's "the ignorant schoolmaster" and concluded that was the answer: "universal teaching was not a method for instructing the people; it was a benefit to be announced to the poor; they could do everything any man could. It sufficed only to announce it"
2 replies 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
