you'd find all kinds of interesting things if you conducted this analysis. sometimes you'll find an account, 40k followers or so, dispensing pandering jokes as if it were a brand, yet discover it isn't monetized it all. the person behind it has "brand discipline,"stays on message
-
-
Show this thread
-
meanwhile i do a fairly robust freelance business. with one notable exception, if i'm typing a piece, it's for a decent sum of money. but these pieces exist outside of the takeconomy or wokeconomy. they're just work-for-hire, so they shouldn't count in an analysis of my account
Show this thread -
thus you can't really do much with an account like this one. there are some other "working writers" in the same boat -- they just produce copy for hire on unglamorous niche topics. but a scabbing academic, tenured ideally, can often be found on here working a big brand account
Show this thread -
@Tinkzorg mentioned this topic to me in the context of these hard-to-classify mini-big accounts that nevertheless serve no discernible function that would justify the time/effort expended on making them so marketable. he also mentioned tweets lamenting declines in likes, etc.Show this thread -
in other words, can there be a "recession" for likes, which are essentially free? can accounts "dip" if their content goes off-brand? this and many other hot topics were discussed on the latest
@whatisleftpod with@tereseaimee, angela nagle, and@Tinkzorg , coming soon.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good idea!
-
Not too sure on the best way of doing that, but we definitely want to get as analytical as possible.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The work of spreading the message. They’re doing the work, and we’re here for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
