The take hustle is a self sustaining economy, of sorts
Show this thread
-
Not quite. They were an established part of that system before they began making money, one of them in particular, and they organized within an emerging payment technology to make more money. This is the case for a lot of new left media.
I don't have faith in any policy prescriptions at this point, which was also the conclusion of my dissertation on school finance litigation: the "schools" writ large have always been failing, since the day they opened, no matter what is done for them. They still have to operate
-
-
I have faith in turtlenecks.
-
The worked for Steve Jobs. And, um, Elizabeth Holmes. Usually, St. Patrick's day is my last turtleneck day of the year (underneath a cliche Aran knit sweater). Unless I ski. Both cancelled this year.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fine. In a political context defined by limited resources (and indeed one party intentionally withholding resources to create the kind institutional failures that validate their anti-institution worldview), "failure" is inevitable as both an outcome and a rhetorical device.
-
But Chapo. That doesn't get to the question of whether they are primary or incidental participants in the Take Hustle. It seems like Takes by definition don't advance a cohesive ideology. Chapo does. Their (I suppose) obnoxious style aside, that would seem to exclude them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.